Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish assessment in tropical streams and rivers.
Isabel Cantera  1@  , Kévin Cilleros  2@  , Alice Valentini  3@  , Axel Cerdan  1@  , Tony Dejean  4@  , Amaia Iribar  2  , Pierre Taberlet  5@  , Régis Vigouroux  6@  , Sébastien Brosse  7  
1 : Evolution et Diversité Biologique  (EDB)  -  Website
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse 3, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique : UMR5174
Université Toulouse III Paul SabatierBâtiment 4R1118, route de Narbonne31062 Toulouse cedex 9France -  France
2 : Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique  (EDB)  -  Website
Université de Toulouse, CNRS : UMR5174, Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UR253, Université Paul Sabatier-Toulouse III - UPS
Université Paul Sabatier Bât. 4R1, 118 route de Narbonne 31062 Toulouse cedex 9 -  France
3 : SPYGEN  -  Website
SPYGEN
4 : SPYGEN  (SPYGEN)
SPYGEN
17, rue du Lac Saint-André, Savoie Technolac - BP 274, 73375 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex -  France
5 : Laboratoire d'écologie alpine  (LECA)  -  Website
CNRS : UMR5553, Université Grenoble Alpes
LECA, BP 53 2233 Rue de la Piscine 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9 -  France
6 : Hydreco Guyane SARL  -  Website
Laboratoire-Environnement de Petit Saut 97388 Kourou Cedex -  French Guiana
7 : Laboratoire Evolution et Diversite Biologique  (EDB)  -  Website
Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III
118 route de Narbonne - 31062 Toulouse -  France

Since Earth experiences a notable decline of biodiversity and considering the services that it provides to humanity, there is an urgent need to develop accurate and efficient methods to measure species diversity. The environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a promising tool to measure aquatic biodiversity. It is based on the capture of DNA from a water sample, but the water volume sampled (i.e. sampling effort) displays a high variability among studies.

We determined the optimal sampling effort to detect fish assemblages in tropical streams and rivers. We collected eDNA replicates in Guianese sites (streams and rivers). We show that a single eDNA replicate of 34 litres of filtered water detected more than 64% of the expected fish fauna, with little variation between replicates. The number of detected species per site saturated after 2 replicates, with a detection rate higher than 71%. Considering fish assemblages, we reveal a strong consistency between replicates that permitted to distinguish the fauna between sites and between ecosystem types (stream versus rivers) using a single eDNA replicate.

These results testify that filtering eDNA from few litres of water is sufficient to achieve relevant inventories of local species assemblages and to distinguish sites according to their fauna. Therefore, this method deserves to be used in the assessment of human impacts such as gold mining, logging and intensive agriculture in highly diverse and threatened ecosystems such as Amazonian rivers.


Online user: 2